• User-uploading of files is now fully enabled!! Check out our full announcement for details.

    All accounts with 0 posts on them have been purged. If you are coming back to us after a long time and you find you can't log in, then that would probably be why.

What is your opinion on the ongoing replacement of whites in the US?

Are you saying that the Bible is Jewish propaganda?
Speak plainly.
Dude I'm going to have to give you a full introduction to the Jewish question. Jews are behind immigration into the west. They're also behind a bunch of other stuff like gun control, homosexuality, feminism, abortion, etc. I'll have to dig up some info graphics for you if you don't believe me. Can also reccomend some reading if you're interested.
 
Dude I'm going to have to give you a full introduction to the Jewish question. Jews are behind immigration into the west. They're also behind a bunch of other stuff like gun control, homosexuality, feminism, abortion, etc.

Oh, okay. What does that have to do with the bible verse you cited?
And why did you respond with that bible verse in the first place?
 
Oh, okay. What does that have to do with the bible verse you cited?
And why did you respond with that bible verse in the first place?
I cited the Bible verse because there's only one religion that worships in a synagogue. If you believe in the Bible, even a little, you can clearly see how jews are the sniveling, conniving, scheming villans of the new testament. Again, jews are the ones who push immigration and who control the politicians that push immigration onto white America. Once you start to notice this, you'll never stop.
 
you can clearly see how jews are the sniveling, conniving, scheming villans of the new testament.

That would be the Pharisees, not the Jews in general. Now some Jews DID hate Jesus, it's very true, but regardless, there were a ton more who followed him and were loyal to the very bitter end. Many more were also just plain old unsure of Jesus, and we see this with (I think, if I recall correctly) Nicodemus who didn't quite follow Jesus but also thought the Pharisees were awful.
 
That would be the Pharisees, not the Jews in general. Now some Jews DID hate Jesus, it's very true, but regardless, there were a ton more who followed him and were loyal to the very bitter end. Many more were also just plain old unsure of Jesus, and we see this with (I think, if I recall correctly) Nicodemus who didn't quite follow Jesus but also thought the Pharisees were awful.

What do you think the modern jews opinion on christ is?
 
I cited the Bible verse because there's only one religion that worships in a synagogue. If you believe in the Bible, even a little, you can clearly see how jews are the sniveling, conniving, scheming villans of the new testament. Again, jews are the ones who push immigration and who control the politicians that push immigration onto white America. Once you start to notice this, you'll never stop.

The verse I posted was saying that the nation that was the feet of the statue in Nebuchadnezzar's dream was not united, it was partly weak and partly strong, which speaks to your point about immigration.

I don't think it matters as to who caused this or why this came about, only that we are currently seeing bible prophecy being fulfilled. That should strengthen our faith and trust in God and in his Word. Satan is ultimately to blame.
 
What do you think the modern jews opinion on christ is?

I THINK that they think him a prophet, but not the actual Son of God as Jesus professed. Could be wrong.

Regardless though, you weren't talking about modern Jews. You were talking about the biblical Jews.

Satan is ultimately to blame.

In the words of Hobbes, "I'm not sure man needs the help."
 
Being a white guy myself who is attracted mainly to white women, I hate it. I don't mind other races existing and even mingling, provided they can do so without anyone getting enslaved, hung from a tree, or beaten to death by an angry mob, but I detest the singling out of white people as the only "bad" race in media, when all the evils committed by white people in history were comitted just as often if not moreso by people of other races. It's not as though white people once ruled an Aryan empire where every white person was a master and everyone with melanin in their skin was a slave; that's how Hitler would have had it (well actually, Hitler would have simply killed the latter off, and a good portion of the former, for not having blonde hair and blue eyes), but that was never the case historically.

For examples, the Ottoman Empire - made up of Middle Easterners - was infamous for chattel slavery (which unfortunately is where part of the harem girl concept comes from), and the majority of African slaves brought to the Americas were sold to their white masters by fellow Africans who had captured them in tribal warfare. You don't hear that taught in schools very often, since it would confuse the message.

On the flip side, white slaves were very commonplace once, particularly the Irish as well as a good portion of enemies captured by Greeks and Romans (they had to staff those galley ships somehow, and paying an honest wage to filthy peasants or, Gods forbid, outsiders, didn't sound very appealing to the ruling elite who'd rather keep their money for wine, beef, and more slaves to replace the ones that died from overexhaustion).

And this is before you consider the centuries of racial and ethnic hatred and prejudice practiced by virtually every culture on Africa-Eurasia; China and Japan, Japan and the Koreas, Jews and Muslims, England and France, England and Scotland, England and Ireland, France and Germany, England and Germany, Russia and Japan...it's easier to list countries that haven't been mortal enemies at some point or another.

So, why exactly are white people being singled out, here? Is it the prevalence of white settlers and non-white slaves in the first couple centuries of American history (which is barely a fraction of the history of humanity as a whole)? I often say that racism isn't a white problem or a black problem, it's a human problem. Most of us are guilty of it, and most of us have suffered because of it. The easiest way to get rid of racism is to just...let go. No more "Black History Month". No more "Juneteenth". Leave the ugly history of slavery and racism behind.

That said, there's something to be said for personal preferences as far as, say, your choice of dates are concerned. If someone finds people of a particular race more attractive, they have a right to save themselves for a person of that race and say "no" to someone not of that race, if they so choose. No one is entitled to anyone. Relationships are a matter of mutual consent, and if someone tries to shame someone else for refusing to date somebody because of their race, that's disrespecting the refuser's right to personal boundaries.
 
Being a white guy myself who is attracted mainly to white women, I hate it. I don't mind other races existing and even mingling, provided they can do so without anyone getting enslaved, hung from a tree, or beaten to death by an angry mob, but I detest the singling out of white people as the only "bad" race in media, when all the evils committed by white people in history were comitted just as often if not moreso by people of other races. It's not as though white people once ruled an Aryan empire where every white person was a master and everyone with melanin in their skin was a slave; that's how Hitler would have had it (well actually, Hitler would have simply killed the latter off, and a good portion of the former, for not having blonde hair and blue eyes), but that was never the case historically.

For examples, the Ottoman Empire - made up of Middle Easterners - was infamous for chattel slavery (which unfortunately is where part of the harem girl concept comes from), and the majority of African slaves brought to the Americas were sold to their white masters by fellow Africans who had captured them in tribal warfare. You don't hear that taught in schools very often, since it would confuse the message.

On the flip side, white slaves were very commonplace once, particularly the Irish as well as a good portion of enemies captured by Greeks and Romans (they had to staff those galley ships somehow, and paying an honest wage to filthy peasants or, Gods forbid, outsiders, didn't sound very appealing to the ruling elite who'd rather keep their money for wine, beef, and more slaves to replace the ones that died from overexhaustion).

And this is before you consider the centuries of racial and ethnic hatred and prejudice practiced by virtually every culture on Africa-Eurasia; China and Japan, Japan and the Koreas, Jews and Muslims, England and France, England and Scotland, England and Ireland, France and Germany, England and Germany, Russia and Japan...it's easier to list countries that haven't been mortal enemies at some point or another.

So, why exactly are white people being singled out, here? Is it the prevalence of white settlers and non-white slaves in the first couple centuries of American history (which is barely a fraction of the history of humanity as a whole)? I often say that racism isn't a white problem or a black problem, it's a human problem. Most of us are guilty of it, and most of us have suffered because of it. The easiest way to get rid of racism is to just...let go. No more "Black History Month". No more "Juneteenth". Leave the ugly history of slavery and racism behind.

That said, there's something to be said for personal preferences as far as, say, your choice of dates are concerned. If someone finds people of a particular race more attractive, they have a right to save themselves for a person of that race and say "no" to someone not of that race, if they so choose. No one is entitled to anyone. Relationships are a matter of mutual consent, and if someone tries to shame someone else for refusing to date somebody because of their race, that's disrespecting the refuser's right to personal boundaries.


You make some good points, and you're close, just not quite there yet. Race mixing needs to stop though, especially with niggers.

Every white nation on earth, save for Poland, is being flooded with third worlders, who are raping the women (and the little boys) murdering the men, and the government will throw you in prison for doing anything about it.

Now why is this only happening to white nations? You don't see Dubai have massive immigration, or any of the other oil rich countries in the middle east. No one is trying to flood into Africa that's for sure.

It's almost as if it is a coordinated attack on white people, in an attempt to replace the white race with low IQ people, who will work for less and accept a lower living standard. Plus you don't have to deal with the pesky whites anymore. Remember the 6 gorillion, oy vey.very.

Every race deserve a nation. So Africans have Africa, Hispanic people have all of South America basically, Arabs have the middle east, what do whites have?
 
If the 1800s and early 1900s taught us anything, it's that segregation does not breed tolerance. I'm against forced diversity, mind, but I'm also against forced segregation. Let people mingle as they please.
 
If the 1800s and early 1900s taught us anything, it's that segregation does not breed tolerance. I'm against forced diversity, mind, but I'm also against forced segregation. Let people mingle as they please.
So there's the catch 22. No migrant is going to want to leave the white nation they immigrated to because of the welfare. Even as much as blacks talk all that we wuz slaves n sheit (at the height of slavery the count was about 300k, if we deported every black who is not a slave descendant it would be the vast majority of blacks today) they never go back to Africa, they never try to separate because they know they rely on the white man's tax dollars.

So, turning off the gibs faucet would be a start, but it wouldn't have the intended effect.

Edit: I just reread this and it kind of didn't make sense. I'm sleep deprived. The point I was trying to make is that if you let Africans and Muslims pick where they want to live, they will always pick white nations over their own countries. So there has to be some kind of laws in place to protect whites from becoming a minority. The white population of the US went down for the first time ever last year and it shows no sign of going back up. Whites are a minority in a lot of states already and in a lot of Europe. Couple that with the mega psyops on white women (and men) that it's racist if you don't race mix or treat other races the exact same as you would your own, plus antinatalisim, low birth rates, and we are on track to be a minority.
 
Last edited:
So there has to be some kind of laws in place to protect whites from becoming a minority.

So your plan is to invade everyone else's rights based on their skin color and stereotyping of such? Guilty until proven innocent?
 
What do you mean by that? In what way do you envision it would be an invasion of rights?

1. You would have to rip away interracial marriages. OR you'd have to make those married go with the colored folk, cutting them off from their family.
2. You will deny access to places and services based purely on skin color.

And even if that's not at all what you were suggesting, you were being vague, so you'll need to define exactly what you're proposing.
 
1. You would have to rip away interracial marriages. OR you'd have to make those married go with the colored folk, cutting them off from their family.
2. You will deny access to places and services based purely on skin color.

And even if that's not at all what you were suggesting, you were being vague, so you'll need to define exactly what you're proposing.

Ideally one state or group of states would function as a New Europe of sorts, with laws similar to Israel's (as much as I dislike them) law of return. There's far too many non-whites in almost every white nation for there to ever be any hope without a massive Civil War, so it makes the most sense to take the whitest part of the nation.
Even Indians have reservations in the US, why do they have more of a right to that than white people do? This would protect the European heritage of the nation, while the rest of the states can turn into new Africa, New New Mexico, or New India if they wish.

What about the non whites already living there?
It's really not that big of an issue. Just stop letting them move in and give them incentives to leave.

This is all hypothetical and just kind of brain storming. Not enough white people have woken up.
 
Ideally one state or group of states would function as a New Europe of sorts, with laws similar to Israel's (as much as I dislike them) law of return. There's far too many non-whites in almost every white nation for there to ever be any hope without a massive Civil War, so it makes the most sense to take the whitest part of the nation.
Even Indians have reservations in the US, why do they have more of a right to that than white people do? This would protect the European heritage of the nation, while the rest of the states can turn into new Africa, New New Mexico, or New India if they wish.

What about the non whites already living there?
It's really not that big of an issue. Just stop letting them move in and give them incentives to leave.

This is all hypothetical and just kind of brain storming. Not enough white people have woken up.

So you're going to force-dislocate people out of their homes and even out of the cities and towns they lived in and make them move to some undesirable part of the country?
 
So you're going to force-dislocate people out of their homes and even out of the cities and towns they lived in and make them move to some undesirable part of the country?
No that's not what I said. Just stop letting them move in.
 
Back
Top