• User-uploading of files is now fully enabled!! Check out our full announcement for details.

    All accounts with 0 posts on them have been purged. If you are coming back to us after a long time and you find you can't log in, then that would probably be why.

Anti Semitic And Main Character Syndrome.

Then what is the difference between white southerners and white northerners? What is the difference between, say, the Swedes and the Norwegians, or any other two neighboring European countries?



Why don't I act like a black person from the ghetto? Are we not the same race? Why don't we have the same culture?



Is it? I haven't seen any statistics about crime rates in Africa. Africa is a huge continent. South Africa is different from Egypt, which is different from Ghana. Each have their own culture, levels of poverty, and unique geographical problems. Each have widely different people. Just like how Koreans are different from Japanese, and are different from Chinese, there are a lot of different kinds of Africans.
There are small differences in different white peoples culture yes, but you don’t see for instance a giant IQ gap, or giant crime spike between them.

If you’re black and don’t act ghetto (I was confused on what you’re saying here) it makes you an outlier.

Africa, specifically South Africa is very violent. The boers have to hire private security and live under lock and key because Africans kept brutally murdering them. Boers are trying to flee because it’s not safe.
 
There are small differences in different white peoples culture yes, but you don’t see for instance a giant IQ gap, or giant crime spike between them.
If my hypothesis is true, I would imagine there would be such a gap in IQ and a crime spike, between white northerners and white southerners.
For example, if we compare Alabama with Wisconsin and look at only white crime, and white IQ, I imagine there would be a significant difference.
 
Africa, specifically South Africa is very violent. The boers have to hire private security and live under lock and key because Africans kept brutally murdering them. Boers are trying to flee because it’s not safe.
I'm not fully up on how South Africa culture is, but I thought they fell pretty hard for the identity politics rhetoric.

Look, I know our human minds can only take so many factors into account at once, so it's easy to simplify and condense large amounts of information and possibilities into sweeping generalizations, but Africa isn't all barbaric. I just zoomed in on Zimbabwe and they have some sprawling cities that could be confused for something in America.

For the life of me, I can't remember the positive example I'm searching for. There's at least one all-black country in Africa that sends over some excellent migrants that are culturally at odds with the American blacks. The problem is, I can't even remind myself which country it is because when I read them on the map, I'm falling victim to the same thing I wrote above. They are all African countries in my mind, so they are all the same. If I get reminded of it later, I'll post it. But the point I wanted to make is even "low IQ races" don't have to behave like negative stereotypes. It's really down to how they were raised and what they deem is acceptable behavior.

Stealth edit: I just searched "Most christian African nation" and Nigeria came up as second place, which was one of the countries I was leaning towards being the answer I wanted. Point being, religion and culture plays a much bigger role than anything here. You don't get Christian African warlords. Houseman may be one of the good ones in your mind, but it's because he was raised correctly and isn't looking for a victim to take advantage of, which is very not Christian to do. You get enough people acting like him in a region, and suddenly that region is going to look like an exception to you, rather than the proof I'm trying to put forward that it's not really about race and IQ first.
 
I'm not fully up on how South Africa culture is, but I thought they fell pretty hard for the identity politics rhetoric.

Look, I know our human minds can only take so many factors into account at once, so it's easy to simplify and condense large amounts of information and possibilities into sweeping generalizations, but Africa isn't all barbaric. I just zoomed in on Zimbabwe and they have some sprawling cities that could be confused for something in America.

For the life of me, I can't remember the positive example I'm searching for. There's at least one all-black country in Africa that sends over some excellent migrants that are culturally at odds with the American blacks. The problem is, I can't even remind myself which country it is because when I read them on the map, I'm falling victim to the same thing I wrote above. They are all African countries in my mind, so they are all the same. If I get reminded of it later, I'll post it. But the point I wanted to make is even "low IQ races" don't have to behave like negative stereotypes. It's really down to how they were raised and what they deem is acceptable behavior.

Stealth edit: I just searched "Most christian African nation" and Nigeria came up as second place, which was one of the countries I was leaning towards being the answer I wanted. Point being, religion and culture plays a much bigger role than anything here. You don't get Christian African warlords. Houseman may be one of the good ones in your mind, but it's because he was raised correctly and isn't looking for a victim to take advantage of, which is very not Christian to do. You get enough people acting like him in a region, and suddenly that region is going to look like an exception to you, rather than the proof I'm trying to put forward that it's not really about race and IQ first.
So if Nigeria is so great, why is no one immigrating there? Why do Nigerian immigrants come to the west? Immigration only flows into western nations.

Also it’s ironic you chose zimbabwe, or as I call it, occupied Rhodesia as an example
 
Last edited:
So if Nigeria is so great, why is no one immigrating there? Why do Nigerian immigrants come to the west? Immigration only flows into western nations.

Also it’s ironic you chose zimbabwe, or as I call it, occupied Rhodesia as an example
Immigration hasn't only flowed into "Western" nations. The "West" went and colonized (immigrated) a whole lot of (at the time) non-western nations like Vinland and the related continent as well as Australia. Boers into Africa. Spaniards and Nazis into South America. Brits into India.

Strife generally move populations. Be it economic, oppression, conquest, etc.

Anyway.. I'm still waiting for you to explain the YT vid I posted, and go ahead and add Chavs to that as well.
 
Immigration hasn't only flowed into "Western" nations. The "West" went and colonized (immigrated) a whole lot of (at the time) non-western nations like Vinland and the related continent as well as Australia. Boers into Africa. Spaniards and Nazis into South America. Brits into India.

Strife generally move populations. Be it economic, oppression, conquest, etc.

Anyway.. I'm still waiting for you to explain the YT vid I posted, and go ahead and add Chavs to that as wel
Sure the west went into other countries. Then when they left, what happened? The countries didn’t stay the same. They got worse, and there was never immigration into non western nations so massive that whites outnumbered the natives, as they do in a lot of states and white countries.

I’ll watch that video you posted and get back to you.
 
How do you explain this whitest "black" person ever?


Many such cases can be found.
Is this what you’re talking about? Guys a low iq moron trying to be something he’s not, or fit in, or maybe just had an insane amount of white guilt. So what? It doesn’t make his skin black. It doesn’t change the shape of his skull, his bone density or muscle mass.
 
Sure the west went into other countries. Then when they left, what happened? The countries didn’t stay the same. They got worse, and there was never immigration into non western nations so massive that whites outnumbered the natives, as they do in a lot of states and white countries.

When they arrived, they did a lot of damage. If you don't think immigration was as big as it is now, then how do you explain the US and Australia? Whites outnumber Natives immensely.

Is this what you’re talking about? Guys a low iq moron trying to be something he’s not, or fit in, or maybe just had an insane amount of white guilt. So what? It doesn’t make his skin black. It doesn’t change the shape of his skull, his bone density or muscle mass.

He's trying to act like, and fit in with, others who behave similarly as he does in the vid. Just like Chavs do. That's called culture, and you're right in that it doesn't have anything to do with his skin-tone or biology.
 
When they arrived, they did a lot of damage. If you don't think immigration was as big as it is now, then how do you explain the US and Australia? Whites outnumber Natives immensely.

I would think that Europeans colonizing different places around the world is very different than the immigration we see today, where an individual or a family moves from one country to another.
 
I would think that Europeans colonizing different places around the world is very different than the immigration we see today, where an individual or a family moves from one country to another.

Not really. Slight variation though, sure, like having slightly more freedom fighters and actually having to build most temples and buildings themselves. Otherwise it was much the same. Poor religious people/families seeking a better life elsewhere, mixed with fighters defend them and cause chaos within the natives. Exploiting the resources and goodwill found at the place.
 
When they arrived, they did a lot of damage. If you don't think immigration was as big as it is now, then how do you explain the US and Australia? Whites outnumber Natives immensely.



He's trying to act like, and fit in with, others who behave similarly as he does in the vid. Just like Chavs do. That's called culture, and you're right in that it doesn't have anything to do with his skin-tone or biology.
Well, I guess you have a point there. When whites first arrived they changed the demographics of the nation. Still doesn’t change that whites are becoming a minority in white nations.

I don’t really get your point. White guy acts ghetto, so what? People look at him like a clown, rightfully so. I’m sure we grew up in similar conditions and you don’t see me acting like that.
 
I would think that Europeans colonizing different places around the world is very different than the immigration we see today, where an individual or a family moves from one country to another.
I have to agree with you again here. Europeans showed up and built countries up. People immigrating to western nations now are doing so because they think it’s a money tree.
Also are you black? Is that what you were saying?
 
Still doesn’t change that whites are becoming a minority in white nations.

We are, yes.

I don’t really get your point. White guy acts ghetto, so what? People look at him like a clown, rightfully so. I’m sure we grew up in similar conditions and you don’t see me acting like that.

My point is that culture is different from skin-tone/biology. Ghetto is a (sub-)culture, Chavs are a (sub-)culture.
And blacks can grow up in similar conditions as you and don't act like that either.
 
So if Nigeria is so great, why is no one immigrating there? Why do Nigerian immigrants come to the west? Immigration only flows into western nations.

Also it’s ironic you chose zimbabwe, or as I call it, occupied Rhodesia as an example
Instead of arguing while saying nothing that addresses what I said, how about we synthesize our points and find a middle ground that makes us both correct?

White Christians built western civilization and then sent out missionaries to other places, such as Africa. Even in the best case where those African countries are filled with decent people, they are still going to be behind the curve. So of course you're still going to get one-way migration because western civ has had more time to develop and stabilize. Things weren't great for whites in Europe before Christianity became the dominant religion either.
 
Also are you black? Is that what you were saying?

Yes.
But don't worry, everyone here has the unlimited N-word pass, including you.

Related:
In one book I read by Thomas Sowell (who is also black), he notes that the geographical conditions also play a large role in the culture that emerges from those places.

Where fruit groes on tress in tropical climates all year round, there is no pressure to work hard, prepare the soil, and gather a stockpile for the winter. This leads to a culture of relative laziness. European climates are not like that, so out of necessity, these countries and their people need to work harder and plan well in order to survive.
 
Last edited:
We are, yes.



My point is that culture is different from skin-tone/biology. Ghetto is a (sub-)culture, Chavs are a (sub-)culture.
And blacks can grow up in similar conditions as you and don't act like that either.
I agree with most of what you say, but race absolutely plays a part.
Yes.
But don't worry, everyone here has the unlimited N-word pass, including you.

Related:
In one book I read by Thomas Sowell (who is also black), he notes that the geographical conditions also play a large role in the culture that emerges from those places.

Where fruit groes on tress in tropical climates all year round, there is no pressure to work hard, prepare the soil, and gather a stockpile for the winter. This leads to a culture of relative laziness. European climates are not like that, so out of necessity, these countries and their people need to work harder and plan well in order to survive.
my nigga

But seriously, what you just said is the point I’ve been trying to make this whole time, although my claim is that it’s race and not culture. There’s a reason why whites gravitate to things like farming, engineering, flying planes, etc. Because races are different from each other. It’s a cardinal sin nowadays to point that out.
 
Instead of arguing while saying nothing that addresses what I said, how about we synthesize our points and find a middle ground that makes us both correct?

White Christians built western civilization and then sent out missionaries to other places, such as Africa. Even in the best case where those African countries are filled with decent people, they are still going to be behind the curve. So of course you're still going to get one-way migration because western civ has had more time to develop and stabilize. Things weren't great for whites in Europe before Christianity became the dominant religion either.
This doesn’t make sense. How has the west had more time to develop than other countries?
 
If you can explain why blacks around the world commit more crimes, are more violent, and have lower IQ, then I will accept that it is culture and not race. Otherwise there really is no explanation.

Detroit used to be called Paris of the west. Zimbabwe used to be an actual functional nation. Haiti also. Hell, even the Dominican Republic is a nicer place to live than Haiti. Liberia was supposed to be a nation for American slaves to go back to. Why?
It’s beyond culture.
 
This is almost starting to get into Nature vs Nurture territory, and I'm firmly in the camp that while Nature sets the upper and lower limits (which are much broader then one thinks), Nurture finalizes the dice throw(s).
 
But seriously, what you just said is the point I’ve been trying to make this whole time, although my claim is that it’s race and not culture. There’s a reason why whites gravitate to things like farming, engineering, flying planes, etc. Because races are different from each other. It’s a cardinal sin nowadays to point that out.

If we imagine a world where blacks lived mostly in norther European countries, and whites lived in Africa, we would expect whites in Africa to be the lazy ones, and blacks in Europe to be the hard-working ones. People who lived in northern countries gravitated towards things like farming, engineering, etc., because their environment forced them to. People who lived in countries nearer to the equator did not because their environment did not.

Perhaps white people are white because of less exposure to sun in the northern areas, and black people are black because of the opposite. In this case, we could say that "race" is an adaptation to one's environment.

Hell, even the Dominican Republic is a nicer place to live than Haiti.

Hatians and Dominicans are both "black", though.
 
This doesn’t make sense. How has the west had more time to develop than other countries?
They've had more time to develop while under a more advanced and stable ideology.

Look at the middle east. They are probably even worse than Africa. Christianity posits that we're all children of God, and to assail one of God's children is an affront to Him, and you will be punished and receive justice against you for it. Islam does not make such a distinction. If you're not following Islam, then you are fair game to be abused or murdered until you do. Under Christianity, you're not supposed to lie ever. Under Islam, it's OK to lie to non-believers so long as it furthers Islam's interests.

Subject a large group of people under one ideology that seeks to always find the truth vs one that says it's OK to bury the truth for a few hundred years, and you get the disparity you see today between the West and the Middle East.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top