• User-uploading of files is now fully enabled!! Check out our full announcement for details.

    All accounts with 0 posts on them have been purged. If you are coming back to us after a long time and you find you can't log in, then that would probably be why.

My Arrogant Opinions on Transgender Stuff

Now this is where it gets interesting. You are speaking about Judaism as a religion. While that is true, it is also a race. Sure there's different jews like Sephardic, Ashkenazi, etc, but they're all jewish. Like how there's Scottish whites, Italian, British. So even if the religion condemns it, the race does not. Orthodox jews are a minority btw, like messianic jews.

Look, man. End of the day, there's plenty of horrible shit done by every single race. Every single one. And even if there was a biological tendency for one thing or another as you suggest, it doesn't matter. You shouldn't assume shit about someone just because of their race, even if your race supposedly happens to be superior. You judge someone by their actions entirely on their own merits.

Indian Proverb said:
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man. The nobility is being superior to your former self.
 
Look, man. End of the day, there's plenty of horrible shit done by every single race. Every single one. And even if there was a biological tendency for one thing or another as you suggest, it doesn't matter. You shouldn't assume shit about someone just because of their race, even if your race supposedly happens to be superior. You judge someone by their actions entirely on their own merits.
You're telling me to not notice patterns. How is it possible the same people run Hollywood, the banks, the news and the government? We're talking less than 2% of the US population. Yet they disproportionately control these institutions. Doesn't this illustrate that its intentional? They didn't get into all these positions by hard work.
 
You're telling me to not notice patterns.

I'm telling you to judge people after you've seen their actions. This doesn't mean you need to treat certain congresspeople or Hollywood execs like they're innocent angels. I can blast the RIAA for example for being the RIAA. I don't need to link them to some random Jewish conspiracy to dislike them.
 
1 John 5:19

Satan may manipulate people, especially under the guise of false religion, to spread propaganda using the news and media and to economically attack his enemies using the economic and political systems. Does he use one group in particular to do this? I dunno, but I don't think it matters. What matters is that we reject the devil. James 4:7
 
You're telling me to not notice patterns. How is it possible the same people run Hollywood, the banks, the news and the government? We're talking less than 2% of the US population. Yet they disproportionately control these institutions. Doesn't this illustrate that its intentional? They didn't get into all these positions by hard work.

Patterns need to make sense and be logical. There's nothing logical about blaming an entire race for something a few do. Like blaming all Germans for Nazists, or all Chinese people for CCP, or all Russians for USSR, or all Whites for the patriarchy & colonialism. See how asinine that is?

What explains their slight prevalence, at least when compared to their percentage of population make-up, is the same nepotism you can find in any race, coupled with the same family & honour tradition that pushes Asians to be "better" at math.

Stop being such an SJW, and look at the real facts, not conjured up nonsense from association fallacies and your own inferiority complex (by stating that Jews have that much power AND a conspiracy, you're in fact stating that they're the superior race).
 
Patterns need to make sense and be logical. There's nothing logical about blaming an entire race for something a few do. Like blaming all Germans for Nazists, or all Chinese people for CCP, or all Russians for USSR, or all Whites for the patriarchy & colonialism. See how asinine that is?

What explains their slight prevalence, at least when compared to their percentage of population make-up, is the same nepotism you can find in any race, coupled with the same family & honour tradition that pushes Asians to be "better" at math.

Stop being such an SJW, and look at the real facts, not conjured up nonsense from association fallacies and your own inferiority complex (by stating that Jews have that much power AND a conspiracy, you're in fact stating that they're the superior race).

Of course I'm not saying it's every jew. I'm just saying it's always one behind it.

I agree, extreme nepotism, and I'm sure there's money changing hands somewhere as well.

It's no inferiority complex. I'm just pointing these things out. I don't pretend to understand why jews do what they do. It seems to me to destabilize western nations. Im trying to show they have a ridiculous amount of power. For instance, antisemitism is now illegal in Florida.

For the record, I don't believe in a superior race. I think all races excel at certain things.
 
Last edited:
Well... You got the extreme conservative cunts club flag as your avatar, and you're hella racist, so... Let's just say I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if you drove a lifted Dodge truck pavement princess with truck nuts on the tow hitch.

Extreme conservative cunts club lol, never heard that one before. I'll fly the rebel flag until the day I die. As far as me being racist, sure I guess you could say that. People are gonna call you racist for just existing while being white. Might as well lean into it and stop cucking.

There is no politician that represents me. In my personal opinion they are all scumbag traitors, every single one. I would go as far as to say that conservatives are worse than liberals. At least liberals are open and honest about what their goals are. Conservatives hide behind this cowardly veneer and try to dress up their talking points to sound like something thats good for you. They are, by default, losers. You only conserve something you've already lost. Gay marriage for instance. Can you find a conservative that still opposes gay marriage, or one that's not secretly a fag already? They don't give a shit about white people, unless they're some rich ceo who donates money to them. Fuck em.


It's bold of you to assume I have the money to spend on things like a lift kit for a new truck. Truck nuts are for fags. It's funny. The guy that would be driving that is most likely the one to cuck out when you call him racist. ThE dEmOcRaTs WaNt 2 dIvIdE uS!!!11!!11
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excuse me, that is the rebel/Southern pride flag. I did the research, remember?

Yes, though... I dunno. I just think there's better rebellious symbols than the confederate battle flag even if it was definitely A symbol of rebellion at one time. The confederate battle flag has just too much baggage around it that, even strictly historically, sends too much of a mixed message in my eyes. The flag is supposed to be about freedom and independence, yeah? But the fact remains that one of the big reasons the South wanted to break away from the North is that the North wanted to outlaw slavery and the South (generally) didn't. And we can talk about states rights vs. federal rights and that is an important conversation to have indeed, but just for the purposes of the confederate battle flag, I don't think the flag is a good symbol for general-purpose rebellion.

As an alternative, I definitely think the old standard skull-and-bones Jolly Roger flag does very nicely as a universal rebel flag. Doesn't have the baggage around it and everyone recognizes it and immediately knows more or less what you/your group is about. The only hang-up about it is that people may think you're JUST about software piracy but that is easily remedied with a quick alteration of the flag.
 
But the fact remains that one of the big reasons the South wanted to break away from the North is that the North wanted to outlaw slavery and the South (generally) didn't....As an alternative, I definitely think the old standard skull-and-bones Jolly Roger flag does very nicely as a universal rebel flag.

So is slavery the issue? Is slavery the reason why you think people shouldn't fly the rebel flag?
 
So is slavery the issue? Is slavery the reason why you think people shouldn't fly the rebel flag?

The whole point of a flag is two-fold. Well, one-fold if you really don't care, but the first is to immediately show people, obviously, that you're a part of a specific group. The second is to convey what the group is about, usually through symbols on the flag. And it's kinda hard to convey what you're about when there's a lot of historical noise behind that flag that you don't actually intend to convey.
 
And it's kinda hard to convey what you're about when there's a lot of historical noise behind that flag that you don't actually intend to convey.

Kind of like how people try to poison the well when it comes to free speech by accusing people who want it as Nazis or racists who just want to say the n-word.

How would you feel if someone tried to forbid us from being allowed saying the n-word, and there was a fight over it, even just a verbal argument? Would people say: "they fought over their right to say the n-word! Racists!"

Would you change the sites name or symbol so as to not be associated with such "historical noise"?

The issue is that there are principles at stake. For the Confederacy, the principle is "we should be able to do whatever we want so long as we vote for it". Part of that "whatever we want" is slavery, sure, like part of "free speech" is the n-word. Our principle is free speech.

So when people say "the civil war wasn't fought over slavery, it was fought over states' rights!"
and then someone smugly reports "a state's right to do what?"
you can answer them with "whatever they decide to do"
 
Last edited:
As an alternative, I definitely think the old standard skull-and-bones Jolly Roger flag does very nicely as a universal rebel flag. Doesn't have the baggage around it and everyone recognizes it and immediately knows more or less what you/your group is about. The only hang-up about it is that people may think you're JUST about software piracy but that is easily remedied with a quick alteration of the flag.
How about the skull and crossbones wearing a rebel flag bandana? I think that would fit for him.
 
How about the skull and crossbones wearing a rebel flag bandana? I think that would fit for him.
that makes me think of the pirate software logo funnily enough
3LM66GO4_400x400.jpg
 
How about the skull and crossbones wearing a rebel flag bandana? I think that would fit for him.
That is singlehandedly the most white trash thing I've ever heard of

Besides, people who don't like the rebel flag aren't going to care its smaller than normal. You also kind of cheapen the flag by doing that. People are still going to talk shit. So it defeats the whole purpose. Might as well just fly it with pride.
 
Last edited:
Kind of like how people try to poison the well when it comes to free speech by accusing people who want it as Nazis or racists who just want to say the n-word.

How would you feel if someone tried to forbid us from being allowed saying the n-word, and there was a fight over it, even just a verbal argument? Would people say: "they fought over their right to say the n-word! Racists!"

Would you change the sites name or symbol so as to not be associated with such "historical noise"?

The issue is that there are principles at stake. For the Confederacy, the principle is "we should be able to do whatever we want so long as we vote for it". Part of that "whatever we want" is slavery, sure, like part of "free speech" is the n-word. Our principle is free speech.

So when people say "the civil war wasn't fought over slavery, it was fought over states' rights!"
and then someone smugly reports "a state's right to do what?"
you can answer them with "whatever they decide to do"

I'm going to tell arnox he can no longer allow people to say nigger. I have the authority to do this because I also run a forum. When arnox pushes back we will just call him racist and paint him and everyone on the forum as a racist low iq redneck.
 
Kind of like how people try to poison the well when it comes to free speech by accusing people who want it as Nazis or racists who just want to say the n-word.

But free speech is an idea. A core ideal. It's not a flag or visual identifier with history behind it. Because of that, it stands by itself much better even if people sometimes do try to poison the well when talking about free speech. Another thing to keep in mind is that if you insist on the flag being viewed as the South actually intended the flag to be viewed back then, then it's technically a flag for state's rights over federal rights, not general rebellion.

Would you change the sites name or symbol so as to not be associated with such "historical noise"?

Actually an interesting question... I think it would be a futile gesture. This is Sanctuary, and I'm the Sanctuary admin. Were I to rename the site and change all the art, if it's still gonna be me running it with the exact same rules as before, then people are of course going to look at the "new" site the same way they did the old site. So the history would stay with us regardless, for better or worse.

How about the skull and crossbones wearing a rebel flag bandana? I think that would fit for him.

I'm thinking more the standard Jolly Roger but with RPG launchers instead of bones underneath the skull. lol That'll send the message real good. Put a book underneath the launchers though because we don't want our guerilla force looking uncultured of course. Heavens to Betsy...
 
That is singlehandedly the most white trash thing I've ever heard of

Besides, people who don't like the rebel flag aren't going to care its smaller than normal. You also kind of cheapen the flag by doing that. People are still going to talk shit. So it defeats the whole purpose. Might as well just fly it with pride.
All I hear is you being mad you didn't come up with that first.

Yup. I thought he was cool for a little while and my feed was flooded with his videos, but I can never trust or relate to someone that doesn't care about consumer rights.
 
Back
Top