Gauche
Arch Disciple
- Messages
- 676
and people say adreanochrome is a conspiracy theoryStem cell rejuvenation:
Preventing aging with stem cell rejuvenation: Feasible or infeasible?
Characterized by dysfunction of tissues, organs, organ systems and the whole organism, aging results from the reduced function of effective stem cell populations. Recent advances in aging research have demonstrated that old tissue stem cells can be rejuvenated ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Young blood replacement:
Young Blood Therapy | Young Blood Institute
Young Blood Institute strives to lessen the aging process later in life. The Young Blood therapy & plasma replacement therapy make you feel young again!youngbloodinstitute.org
Personally, my life would be all the better for it
Why can't we ever just disagree respectfully without insulting each other calm down people it's not that serious it's just a game that has no bearing on our lives lolNow here, you got me all excited with that title for a second, thinking that some (very) ignorant user or an entertaining troll signed up here.
As to the OP, the thread's 14 pages...
Well, my God hates lying, but also disallows blood transfusions, so you could ask "why would you ever not have a life-saving medical procedure just out of loyalty to your god"?So ultimately my question is what compels you (If you're one of these people) to be so loyal to a creator or creation or god to the point where you're willing to lie and ignore clear life hacks? I'm just dishonestly curious because if discussions can't happen to help improve life then we shouldn't expect the improvements we want.
Sounds dumb to meWell, my God hates lying, but also disallows blood transfusions, so you could ask "why would you ever not have a life-saving medical procedure just out of loyalty to your god"?
To which the answer is: Because my life is not the most important thing, God's good name is.
What if said babies have no life? Stillbirths? Eating babies can be inhumane but it doesn't have to be either.If one would eat babies to better their own life, they're saying that their life is more important than the baby's. If they'd give up their lives in defense of the right to eat babies, then they're saying that the lives of others are more important than their own.
Repenting is easy, and costs nothing. You don't have cut yourself open and drain the blood back out, or anything. If murder can be forgiven, so too can this.Like what if a devotee got like halfway into the scripture/teachings, consented to a life saving blood transfusion, and later learned god wanted them dead. Do they just continue playing dumb or repent with their life having soiled god's good name?
This isn't the most important "commandment", or anything, so lesson one is not "WHATEVER YOU DO, DON'T GET A BLOOD TRANSFUSTION!"Do you fault the order of education? Are all followers fucking up by not making that an upfront thing to know? Do twitter bios need to be edited? If god disallows for something why permit the existence of it?
When you said "babies" I thought you were referring to living humans, as opposed to corpses, in the same way that "cows" are different than "beef", in common contexts.What if said babies have no life? Stillbirths? Eating babies can be inhumane but it doesn't have to be either.