Bottom and Top 10 U.S. States Ordered by Proportion of Arrests to Population (2019)

[Arnox]

I could find arrests by state, but I weirdly couldn't find arrest numbers in direct proportion to a state's population, so I took the statistics from this source specifically, courtesy of the FBI. Again, weirdly, they don't seem to have any statistics newer than 2019. I know it takes a long while probably to round everything up, but a five-year space seems a really long time. I've attached the full spreadsheet to this post which has the calculated proportions on the farthest rightmost column labeled "Peacefulness factor." Yeah I know it's lame but I didn't know what else to call it. lol

The final numbers I list here are obtained very simply by dividing the state population by the total number of arrests per state including juvenile arrests. Of course, this list isn't the end-all-be-all of whether a state is going to be peaceful or not as a state may simply not adequately report their numbers, or perhaps places like New York simply don't get crimes reported by their citizens nearly as often as they normally should due to the incredible ineffectiveness of the police in that area.

Anyway, without further ado,

Bottom 10 U.S. States by Proportion of Arrests (Lower number is worse)
Illinois 17.7
Kentucky 17.8
South Dakota 18.4
Mississippi 19.0
Wyoming 19.6
Nevada 20.2
Tennessee 20.2
Arkansas 22.7
New Mexico 22.8
North Dakota 23.3

Top 10 U.S. States by Proportion of Arrests (Higher number is better)
Texas 41.6
Rhode Island 41.7
Washington 41.9
Ohio 44.6
New York 45.3
Hawaii 45.4
Michigan 45.5
Alabama 46.8
West Virginia 56
Massachusetts 58

 

[gaijinkaiju]

cool, now do it by race

 

[Arnox]

cool, now do it by race

Loading…

ucr.fbi.gov

They seem to be doing this weird separate thing with Latino ethnicities that I don't understand whatsoever. Regardless though, whites are arrested the most by far.

 

[gaijinkaiju]

Loading…

ucr.fbi.gov

They seem to be doing this weird separate thing with Latino ethnicities that I don't understand whatsoever. Regardless though, whites are arrested the most by far.

"White"

 

[Arnox]

"White"

Don't know what to tell ya', man. The numbers say what they say. lol

 

[Vendor-Lazarus]

Don't know what to tell ya', man. The numbers say what they say. lol

Just a heads-up that the image viewer isn't fully working. Clicking on the images just gets you to a (pop-up) loading screen.

 

[Houseman]

Isn't fully working*

*On Vendor's very specific machine

 

[Vendor-Lazarus]

Isn't fully working*

*On Vendor's very specific machine

Not machine. Browser. If a site is working on Pale Moon/Basilisk, it works on 99% of browsers. The same can't be said between chromium and firefox. google loves to put out "new" standards (that are many times just rehashes/reinventing the wheel in a more complicated way that only They support) that further entrenches their monopolistic behavior.

 

[Gauche]

Same issue here - also on Palemoon
Image never loads in and the circle just spins infinitely
Fuck circles btw, bring back 0% load bars

If I right click and open image in new tab it loads fine

Previous Xenforo version loaded in the images fine

 

[Arnox]

Just a heads-up that the image viewer isn't fully working. Clicking on the images just gets you to a (pop-up) loading screen.

View attachment 523

Well, I don't think this is a Firefox problem as it's still working perfectly fine for me, even with Resist Fingerprinting on, but Palemoon has long since diverged from the core Firefox code. I downloaded Palemoon Portable though, and after trying it, I'm able to reproduce the issue as well. And as Gauche has said, you can still view the image in a separate tab or click the external link icon to go to it directly or download it or whatever, but the Lightbox viewer itself just won't load the image in the main view at all.

The three jQuery errors can be ignored by the way. I get those on Firefox too. They don't seem to affect anything.

I would talk to the Pale Moon devs and see what they have to say about this.

 

[Dale Gribble]

Don't know what to tell ya', man. The numbers say what they say. lol

Okay, I'm the expert, I can explain

To start race on all official forms is self reported. That means you can claim whatever you want. Now as for someone being white, there's two subsections, white and Hispanic and white non Hispanic, because back in the day Mexicans argued in court they weren't black or white and didn't know how to fill government forms out. In most statistics they get lumped together. Now as for whites committing a majority of the crime, when you take the other factors into account and population size it makes sense. So here is where things get interesting. If you were to look at the FBI universal crime report and sort by violent crime and race you would see the infamous 13/50. (13% of the population commits 50% of violent crime) Insanely disproportionate. Really it's worse than that because if you take away women, old people and babies it's more like 3% Utter insanity... what could the explanation be?