Menu
Home
Forums
Visual works
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Info & rules
Site rules
Server list
Sanctuary Discord
Sanctuary FAQ
Sanctuary's origins
Staffing policies
Sanctuary YouTube
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Banned members
User verification codes
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Welcome to the edge of the civilized internet! All our official content can be found
here.
If you have any questions, try our FAQ
here
or see our video on
why this site exists at all!
Home
Forums
Main Sub-Forums
News of the World
2022 Study on Reliability, Bias, and Professionalism of News Networks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="Arnox, post: 14412, member: 1"]</p><p>Not sure what you're trying to say here. As to the link though, it is an interesting read, but consider a couple things. When it comes to news and compiled reports, we are not dealing with evaluating one person or another. We dealing with evaluating the trustworthiness of GROUPS of people. It doesn't matter for us how a group presents, one way or another. We only care about their results. Does the group put personal feelings aside for facts? How good has their accuracy been? In this case, we must do a broad statistical analysis. And in that case, professionalism and track record are major factors, or combining those two, probability of correctness is the major factor we're looking at here.</p><p></p><p>The article is also talking about having to make a judgement on someone just by looking at them. We don't have to do that. We have history and experience that we can evaluate. We don't need to assume anything or make snap judgements because we already have all the facts in front of us. Someone just needed to do the long boring work of sifting through it all.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Arnox, post: 14412, member: 1"] Not sure what you're trying to say here. As to the link though, it is an interesting read, but consider a couple things. When it comes to news and compiled reports, we are not dealing with evaluating one person or another. We dealing with evaluating the trustworthiness of GROUPS of people. It doesn't matter for us how a group presents, one way or another. We only care about their results. Does the group put personal feelings aside for facts? How good has their accuracy been? In this case, we must do a broad statistical analysis. And in that case, professionalism and track record are major factors, or combining those two, probability of correctness is the major factor we're looking at here. The article is also talking about having to make a judgement on someone just by looking at them. We don't have to do that. We have history and experience that we can evaluate. We don't need to assume anything or make snap judgements because we already have all the facts in front of us. Someone just needed to do the long boring work of sifting through it all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Preview
Name
Verification
What is the first letter of the site name?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Main Sub-Forums
News of the World
2022 Study on Reliability, Bias, and Professionalism of News Networks
Top