Menu
Home
Forums
Visual works
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Info & rules
Site rules
Server list
Sanctuary Discord
Sanctuary FAQ
Sanctuary's origins
Staffing policies
Sanctuary YouTube
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Banned members
User verification codes
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Welcome to the edge of the civilized internet! All our official content can be found
here.
If you have any questions, try our FAQ
here
or see our video on
why this site exists at all!
Home
Forums
Site and Community Discussion
News of the Sanctuary
We Will No Longer Be Actively Supporting Chromium-Based Browsers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="Vendor-Lazarus, post: 14009, member: 4"]</p><p>It's true that LibreWolf could always fork it (true, hard, fork. I'm highlighting this because many purported forks are just soft forks, rebuilds), although they'd risk falling behind because they don't have as many devs as google & firefox. While trying to keep up with googles rapid release cycle. Since it already contains so much google code (which they also need to adhere to for the most part, making it still very chromium-lite). They also risk being called an outdated and old Firefox build (this is a favorite go-to for FF fanboys).</p><p></p><p>I'd love to see LibreWolf coming out with their own engine and browser though (although I'd rather see googles monopoly be broken up and sites going back to become browser-neutral, with fallbacks. Not adhering to WEI, MV3, DOM by default).</p><p></p><p>Pale Moon has been independent since 2014. So yeah, they'd survive the fall of Firefox just fine.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Vendor-Lazarus, post: 14009, member: 4"] It's true that LibreWolf could always fork it (true, hard, fork. I'm highlighting this because many purported forks are just soft forks, rebuilds), although they'd risk falling behind because they don't have as many devs as google & firefox. While trying to keep up with googles rapid release cycle. Since it already contains so much google code (which they also need to adhere to for the most part, making it still very chromium-lite). They also risk being called an outdated and old Firefox build (this is a favorite go-to for FF fanboys). I'd love to see LibreWolf coming out with their own engine and browser though (although I'd rather see googles monopoly be broken up and sites going back to become browser-neutral, with fallbacks. Not adhering to WEI, MV3, DOM by default). Pale Moon has been independent since 2014. So yeah, they'd survive the fall of Firefox just fine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Preview
Name
Verification
What is the name of the default style? (Look to the bottom left of the page.)
Post reply
Home
Forums
Site and Community Discussion
News of the Sanctuary
We Will No Longer Be Actively Supporting Chromium-Based Browsers
Top