Menu
Home
Forums
Visual works
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Info & rules
Site rules
Server list
Sanctuary Discord
Sanctuary FAQ
Sanctuary's origins
Staffing policies
Sanctuary YouTube
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Banned members
User verification codes
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Welcome to the edge of the civilized internet! All our official content can be found
here.
If you have any questions, try our FAQ
here
or see our video on
why this site exists at all!
Home
Forums
Main Sub-Forums
Technophiliacs & Technophiles
Bus Kill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="JamesTaiclet, post: 14091, member: 278"]</p><p>Hello,</p><p></p><p>I can understand the adversity to windows. Windows 8.1, 10, and 11 all have very similar winapi changes with minimal, if any, differences. Whatever application would come as a result of this would likely work on all of them. I only focus on windows because something like this would be great in addition to Veracrypt's plausibly deniable operating system model. This would allow a user to have two separate operating systems working in tandem that look identical. When the ac + stick would be pulled, the person would be logged out. Should they be demanded to log back in, they can then log into their fake operating system. Unfortunately veracrypt has not worked on a version of this for linux, likely due to their chronic under-funding.</p><p></p><p>I think the best route for all of this in a more mature program would be to structure the codebase so that it used a common interface library such as qt, and then the functions to check for the presence of the AC power and USB drive's be in separate libraries. At compile time, the user would specify which they OS they are building for, which would set the macros to compile only things relevant to that operating system. This would allow the same codebase to be maintained for both programs.</p><p></p><p>Yours,</p><p>James Taiclet</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="JamesTaiclet, post: 14091, member: 278"] Hello, I can understand the adversity to windows. Windows 8.1, 10, and 11 all have very similar winapi changes with minimal, if any, differences. Whatever application would come as a result of this would likely work on all of them. I only focus on windows because something like this would be great in addition to Veracrypt's plausibly deniable operating system model. This would allow a user to have two separate operating systems working in tandem that look identical. When the ac + stick would be pulled, the person would be logged out. Should they be demanded to log back in, they can then log into their fake operating system. Unfortunately veracrypt has not worked on a version of this for linux, likely due to their chronic under-funding. I think the best route for all of this in a more mature program would be to structure the codebase so that it used a common interface library such as qt, and then the functions to check for the presence of the AC power and USB drive's be in separate libraries. At compile time, the user would specify which they OS they are building for, which would set the macros to compile only things relevant to that operating system. This would allow the same codebase to be maintained for both programs. Yours, James Taiclet [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Preview
Name
Verification
What is the name of the default style? (Look to the bottom left of the page.)
Post reply
Home
Forums
Main Sub-Forums
Technophiliacs & Technophiles
Bus Kill
Top