Menu
Home
Forums
Visual works
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Info & rules
Site rules
Server list
Sanctuary Discord
Sanctuary FAQ
Sanctuary's origins
Staffing policies
Sanctuary YouTube
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Banned members
User verification codes
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Welcome to the edge of the civilized internet! All our official content can be found
here.
If you have any questions, try our FAQ
here
or see our video on
why this site exists at all!
Home
Forums
Site and Community Discussion
Help & Suggestions
Potential New Sub-Forum + Potential Rule Change
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="Arnox, post: 12689, member: 1"]</p><p>[USER=4]@Vendor-Lazarus[/USER] and I have been talking for a little bit about reviews and how it may be better for everyone if they were all put in a new sub-forum with thread prefixes to further categorize them. You can use the powerful filter tools to sort all reviews by category, reviewer, or both. And once we actually update the board software, users will be able to choose which sub-forums they want to see or ignore in the Recent Threads list. Although, keep in mind, you can already do this if you're willing to do a bit of manual work and use the "What's new" tab or just browse to the Watched tab under Forums. The tab bar is actually more powerful than I think most people realize, even if its sorting and watching tools aren't really that useful for us at this time.</p><p></p><p>The second change proposed would be an edit to Rule #4.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>PI's still definitely gonna keep being banned, so don't worry. A lifting of that rule is not what's getting proposed. Instead, following the events of KiwiFarms being taken down by CloudFlare, a discussion arose regarding exactly HOW we should deal with PI violations. I proposed expanding the rule a little to instead include not just the PI of members here, but the PI of anyone else, assuming they verify with me directly via email that it is indeed their PI. Houseman proposed going even further and just doing a flat ban of ALL PI, verified or not. I think that would run afoul of some edge cases such as the occasional meme or joke or even might get in the way of someone trying to put in fake PI details in order to obscure the real PI. Nevertheless, Houseman disagrees and believes these edge cases are not really significant enough as compared to needing to trust the Sanctuary admins with their PI to enforce.</p><p></p><p>Let me know what you guys think about both these changes.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Arnox, post: 12689, member: 1"] [USER=4]@Vendor-Lazarus[/USER] and I have been talking for a little bit about reviews and how it may be better for everyone if they were all put in a new sub-forum with thread prefixes to further categorize them. You can use the powerful filter tools to sort all reviews by category, reviewer, or both. And once we actually update the board software, users will be able to choose which sub-forums they want to see or ignore in the Recent Threads list. Although, keep in mind, you can already do this if you're willing to do a bit of manual work and use the "What's new" tab or just browse to the Watched tab under Forums. The tab bar is actually more powerful than I think most people realize, even if its sorting and watching tools aren't really that useful for us at this time. The second change proposed would be an edit to Rule #4. PI's still definitely gonna keep being banned, so don't worry. A lifting of that rule is not what's getting proposed. Instead, following the events of KiwiFarms being taken down by CloudFlare, a discussion arose regarding exactly HOW we should deal with PI violations. I proposed expanding the rule a little to instead include not just the PI of members here, but the PI of anyone else, assuming they verify with me directly via email that it is indeed their PI. Houseman proposed going even further and just doing a flat ban of ALL PI, verified or not. I think that would run afoul of some edge cases such as the occasional meme or joke or even might get in the way of someone trying to put in fake PI details in order to obscure the real PI. Nevertheless, Houseman disagrees and believes these edge cases are not really significant enough as compared to needing to trust the Sanctuary admins with their PI to enforce. Let me know what you guys think about both these changes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Preview
Name
Verification
What is the name of the default style? (Look to the bottom left of the page.)
Post reply
Home
Forums
Site and Community Discussion
Help & Suggestions
Potential New Sub-Forum + Potential Rule Change