Menu
Home
Forums
Visual works
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Info & rules
Site rules
Server list
Sanctuary Discord
Sanctuary FAQ
Sanctuary's origins
Staffing policies
Sanctuary YouTube
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Banned members
User verification codes
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Welcome to the edge of the civilized internet! All our official content can be found
here.
If you have any questions, try our FAQ
here
or see our video on
why this site exists at all!
Home
Forums
Main Sub-Forums
Spurious Generalities
An Analysis of Suicide Methods
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="Arnox, post: 14448, member: 1"]</p><p>This one gave me pause for a minute, but consider that there is obviously zero reason and zero justification to seduce a minor. None. There is justification, however scant, for suicide in very specific situations. In fairness though, most of the time, no, suicide is not justified at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well technically, Drath, we don't need anything. We don't need to post guides on how to pirate or how to find reputable news sources beyond the mainstream ones, but there are legitimate justified uses for both of those just as there is justification for suicide, again, in very, very specific situations.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's very interesting that you say that. Let's talk about this then. On YouTube, I can do a quick search and immediately find out how to make a nuclear bomb. I could probably even find, with some further digging, where to find fissile material. Is YouTube responsible for this then? Are the creators who made that content? Let's take another example. How many games feature mass-murdering of innocent people? Doesn't that spur people to do it? In that case, you are literally pulling the trigger or stabbing the knife into someone and watching them die. If you think this thread is not acceptable content because it encourages people to kill themselves, then where is the line? Isn't this ENTIRE SITE a crime against humanity because we allow people to say the 'n' word with a hard 'r' and let racists talk about their racist beliefs without any form of censorship?</p><p></p><p>On the shroomery.org boards, I'm sure I could find people talking about their experience with hard non-psychedelic drugs and maybe even how to manufacture them. I not only linked to that forum but promoted it as a good website for discussion. Nobody said anything about that. Not a word. How about sciencemadness.org? They have recipes on explosives. Literally what you were just talking about.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You didn't say a word about that site I linked. Not a peep. How about</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://intosanctuary.com/index.php?threads/pedophilia-is-a-natural-sexual-orientation.313[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Now we're encouraging pedophilia then, aren't we? Oh my goodness, why are we even allowing discussion about these top-</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://intosanctuary.com/index.php?threads/pedophilia-is-a-natural-sexual-orientation.313/post-12094[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Oh...</p><p></p><p>Look, if you think the guide is poorly written, that's fair. If you want more sources, that's also fair. All things that I can see. But let's not come up with any such nonsense about responsibility and what we're encouraging here. I assumed this was decided a long time ago. We DO have rules, yes. There are lines, yes, but the only reason why we have those rules in the first place is because it was HEAVILY debated and talked about. Someone needed to bring those things up for discussion and through that, we found out where those hard lines were.</p><p></p><p>So... Before we go any further with discussion on the particulars of the guide, do you think guides on suicide should be against the rules?</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Arnox, post: 14448, member: 1"] This one gave me pause for a minute, but consider that there is obviously zero reason and zero justification to seduce a minor. None. There is justification, however scant, for suicide in very specific situations. In fairness though, most of the time, no, suicide is not justified at all. Well technically, Drath, we don't need anything. We don't need to post guides on how to pirate or how to find reputable news sources beyond the mainstream ones, but there are legitimate justified uses for both of those just as there is justification for suicide, again, in very, very specific situations. That's very interesting that you say that. Let's talk about this then. On YouTube, I can do a quick search and immediately find out how to make a nuclear bomb. I could probably even find, with some further digging, where to find fissile material. Is YouTube responsible for this then? Are the creators who made that content? Let's take another example. How many games feature mass-murdering of innocent people? Doesn't that spur people to do it? In that case, you are literally pulling the trigger or stabbing the knife into someone and watching them die. If you think this thread is not acceptable content because it encourages people to kill themselves, then where is the line? Isn't this ENTIRE SITE a crime against humanity because we allow people to say the 'n' word with a hard 'r' and let racists talk about their racist beliefs without any form of censorship? On the shroomery.org boards, I'm sure I could find people talking about their experience with hard non-psychedelic drugs and maybe even how to manufacture them. I not only linked to that forum but promoted it as a good website for discussion. Nobody said anything about that. Not a word. How about sciencemadness.org? They have recipes on explosives. Literally what you were just talking about. You didn't say a word about that site I linked. Not a peep. How about [URL unfurl="true"]https://intosanctuary.com/index.php?threads/pedophilia-is-a-natural-sexual-orientation.313[/URL] Now we're encouraging pedophilia then, aren't we? Oh my goodness, why are we even allowing discussion about these top- [URL unfurl="true"]https://intosanctuary.com/index.php?threads/pedophilia-is-a-natural-sexual-orientation.313/post-12094[/URL] Oh... Look, if you think the guide is poorly written, that's fair. If you want more sources, that's also fair. All things that I can see. But let's not come up with any such nonsense about responsibility and what we're encouraging here. I assumed this was decided a long time ago. We DO have rules, yes. There are lines, yes, but the only reason why we have those rules in the first place is because it was HEAVILY debated and talked about. Someone needed to bring those things up for discussion and through that, we found out where those hard lines were. So... Before we go any further with discussion on the particulars of the guide, do you think guides on suicide should be against the rules? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Preview
Name
Verification
What is the first letter of the site name?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Main Sub-Forums
Spurious Generalities
An Analysis of Suicide Methods
Top