Menu
Home
Forums
Visual works
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Info & rules
Site rules
Server list
Sanctuary Discord
Sanctuary FAQ
Sanctuary's origins
Staffing policies
Sanctuary YouTube
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Banned members
User verification codes
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New media
New comments
Search media
Menu
Log in
Register
Welcome to the edge of the civilized internet! All our official content can be found
here.
If you have any questions, try our FAQ
here
or see our video on
why this site exists at all!
Home
Visual works
Videos
The Windows Power User's Guide to Linux
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Comment
Message
<p>[QUOTE="SViN, xfmg-comment: 49"]</p><p>I think debian could make some things to make the experience better in general, like a proper release upgrade system. Debian can't upgrade between releases at all and instead the user needs to go and change releases from /etc/apt/sources.list which can cause issues in the upgrade process. In fact one of the main benefits of ubuntu is that it has a proper upgrade system that takes into account all the issues that come with apt(of which there are many)</p><p></p><p>Pop_OS has some good features MX linux could adopt like a recovery partition. Basically its a small 4GB partition where the OS saves a recovery image, you can later use that image to recover the OS in the event of something bad happening.</p><p></p><p>Also Linux mint relies on ubuntu LTS which has the same release schedule (or even more predictable) than debian. It's upgrade process is even more sophisticated than normal ubuntu due to actually keeping a backup of your root partition in case something bad happens with timeshift.</p><p></p><p>I have not used MX or rather its predecessor anti-x in a long time however so i am not sure what it has implemented that is similar to this.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="SViN, xfmg-comment: 49"] I think debian could make some things to make the experience better in general, like a proper release upgrade system. Debian can't upgrade between releases at all and instead the user needs to go and change releases from /etc/apt/sources.list which can cause issues in the upgrade process. In fact one of the main benefits of ubuntu is that it has a proper upgrade system that takes into account all the issues that come with apt(of which there are many) Pop_OS has some good features MX linux could adopt like a recovery partition. Basically its a small 4GB partition where the OS saves a recovery image, you can later use that image to recover the OS in the event of something bad happening. Also Linux mint relies on ubuntu LTS which has the same release schedule (or even more predictable) than debian. It's upgrade process is even more sophisticated than normal ubuntu due to actually keeping a backup of your root partition in case something bad happens with timeshift. I have not used MX or rather its predecessor anti-x in a long time however so i am not sure what it has implemented that is similar to this. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
What is the first letter of the site name?
Post comment
Preview
Home
Visual works
Videos
The Windows Power User's Guide to Linux
Top