• User-uploading of files is now fully enabled!! Check out our full announcement for details.

    All accounts with 0 posts on them have been purged. If you are coming back to us after a long time and you find you can't log in, then that would probably be why.

The Sanctuary Music Hall

The media embed has been removed due to the album art almost being a Rule 2 violation. I won't be a hardass about it since I know you're just wanting to post music. I don't know what Bandcamp is doing though, allowing that kind of album art. >_>

Bad take. If you think a normal bathing suit is Rule 2, you seriously need to reconsider your own definition, because that's not what it means. There's nothing sexual about it, and not even just nudity (which isn't the same). It's a view anyone visiting any beach or bathhouse or even backyard pool barbecue, at any time can see.
 
Bad take. If you think a normal bathing suit is Rule 2, you seriously need to reconsider your own definition, because that's not what it means. There's nothing sexual about it, and not even just nudity (which isn't the same). It's a view anyone visiting any beach or bathhouse or even backyard pool barbecue, at any time can see.

And I have a rant as well about how parents are using bikinis for their toddlers instead of just a regular one-piece. In any case though, the rule specifically prohibits images of anyone in a bikini that is under 18.
 
And I have a rant as well about how parents are using bikinis for their toddlers instead of just a regular one-piece. In any case though, the rule specifically prohibits images of anyone in a bikini that is under 18.

It actually says "#2 - Child pornography (CP), which can be defined as attachments, images, videos, or links to such of anyone nude and under the age of 18, no matter what the context and sexually suggestive attachments, images, videos or links to such of anyone under the age of 18 with partial clothing. (Bikinis, etc.)"

"anyone nude and under the age of 18" Which this isn't (nude). And then "sexually suggestive attachments, images, videos or links to such of anyone under the age of 18 with partial clothing. (Bikinis, etc.). Which again, this isn't (sexually suggestive).

Are you going to ban links to Jesus nativity scenes like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nativity_of_Jesus?useskin=vector & https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org...istorical-jesus/when-was-jesus-born-bc-or-ad/ next?

You're not even separating real from fictional depictions, despite that since 2002, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition established that two overbroad provisions of the CPPA of 1996 was struck down by the US Supreme Court because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech." The Court found the CPPA to have no support in Ferber since the CPPA prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production. Furthermore, district court Judge James E. Gritzner ruled in United States v. Handley that two parts of the PROTECT Act of 2003 criminalizing "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" was unconstitutional. There are no cases that are considered to have overruled it.

Maybe a re-write of the rule to specify media of Real nude persons under 18 being sexually suggestive.
 
It actually says "#2 - Child pornography (CP), which can be defined as attachments, images, videos, or links to such of anyone nude and under the age of 18, no matter what the context and sexually suggestive attachments, images, videos or links to such of anyone under the age of 18 with partial clothing. (Bikinis, etc.)"

"anyone nude and under the age of 18" Which this isn't (nude). And then "sexually suggestive attachments, images, videos or links to such of anyone under the age of 18 with partial clothing. (Bikinis, etc.). Which again, this isn't (sexually suggestive).

Are you going to ban links to Jesus nativity scenes like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nativity_of_Jesus?useskin=vector & https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org...istorical-jesus/when-was-jesus-born-bc-or-ad/ next?

You're not even separating real from fictional depictions, despite that since 2002, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition established that two overbroad provisions of the CPPA of 1996 was struck down by the US Supreme Court because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech." The Court found the CPPA to have no support in Ferber since the CPPA prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production. Furthermore, district court Judge James E. Gritzner ruled in United States v. Handley that two parts of the PROTECT Act of 2003 criminalizing "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" was unconstitutional. There are no cases that are considered to have overruled it.

Maybe a re-write of the rule to specify media of Real nude persons under 18 being sexually suggestive.

Discussion continued here: https://intosanctuary.com/index.php?threads/discussions-on-rule-2-of-the-seven-deadly-sins.1869/
 
MEDIA=bandcampalbum
Using the album for the embed is a bit tricky
Bandcamp does this thing where the Artist can feature a track of their choosing to play first and plays the rest of the album from that point on which carries over into the embeds. You'll see below this artist choose to feature track 12, the last song on the album
(I'm guessing the extra space Arnox cropped out was to accommodate the track list for album embeds)

The play order can be bypassed on the custom url player link but embeds are sadly fucked which is why I've stuck to MEDIA=bandcamptrack
 

Even finding the share link to the album/track was finicky (and not useful un-altered). Bandcamp seems to be following the modern trend of hiding stuff and not allowing New Tab clicks.

How do you find track URL and not album? Did I just get lucky and posted Singles?

Thanks, and also, you're welcome ,)
 
How do you find track URL and not album?
Maybe the color text disguised them or your browser setup is acting up
On the album page, track names are hyperlinks, which can be opened in a new tab - click any for the track URL

To find values I do:
Ctrl+U
Ctrl+F album_id or track_id

Even finding the share link to the album/track was finicky (and not useful un-altered). Bandcamp seems to be following the modern trend of hiding stuff and not allowing New Tab clicks.
The Share / Embed is really useful for blog posting but is barely helpful for forum posts as it requires editing
Album/Track pages have hardly changed since Bandcamp first started - hiding away the social media share buttons says a lot to that effort I think. Meanwhile the homepage/search (LET ME GO BACK TO THAT 887 PAGE RESULTS - INFINITE SCROLL WAS A MISTAKE) isn't recognizable from what it use to be

Did I just get lucky and posted Singles?
SHAMPOO HAT plays two tracks
 
Maybe the color text disguised them or your browser setup is acting up
On the album page, track names are hyperlinks, which can be opened in a new tab - click any for the track URL

To find values I do:
Ctrl+U
Ctrl+F album_id or track_id

Getting into the nitty-gritty backend eh. I found it out on the front now that you mentioned one of them having two tracks. It's indeed in the absolute middle of stuff. I started with Ctrl+F and searched for " - " (spaces around the dash required). #2 find is the start of the track(s). Then just right-clicking and copying the link location.

(LET ME GO BACK TO THAT 887 PAGE RESULTS - INFINITE SCROLL WAS A MISTAKE)

Couldn't agree more!
 


Released her only one flop single, "I'm Satisfied". Recorded the theme song, "One Day At A Time from TV series of the same name while working at that time as a session backing singer for disco band, Eleventh Hour on "Hollywood Hot". Discontinued as a solo artist in 1976 and became a session backing vocalist. Retired in 1979 and left the music industry.
0017713668_100.png
When you get immortalized for your work on the internet but like not in a great way
 
Back
Top