- Messages
- 6,144
Sorry this took so long. I was procrastinating replying because there was so much to reply to. lol
It won't ever be "under control". Just pushed to different places. And for what? If you want to punish sex-trafficking, do it. You don't need to ban porn to enforce that. Actually, if anything, banning porn makes busting sex-traffickers harder as they retreat underground more.
See Vendor's reply to this.
Why is dressing sexy being "a whore"?
Wait... How have you seen it "with your own eyes"? Did you actually go to these drag shows yourself?
Guess what, man? Withdrawals aren't the only aspect of drug addiction. They didn't solve any problem. They just made things worse for the lower class in order to make themselves feel better. And regardless, are we SERIOUSLY going to promote a nation that decides you need to be killed just because you owned a bunch of fucking weed?
Well yeah. They want to use because their lives are shit. That or they're tricked into taking fentanyl (bad drug sourcing is yet another problem by making drugs illegal by the way) and get hooked.
People's reactions to different drugs are not always the same. Some people, for example, find weed to be addictive, whereas other people can't even stand meth. You need to have more empathy. Now, yeah, let's say you DO give someone all the resources in the world to quit and they still do it. Then yes, there's not much at all you can do in that case and no amount of empathy is going to make them stop. But that's my point. To just completely deprive addicts of resources to help themselves have a new start and THEN blame them for relapsing because "they didn't try hard enough" is both inaccurate and insulting to them I feel.
People abuse it because there's no other form of relief, or very few forms. You know, there have been other countries that used to struggle with a huge heroin problem, but they fixed it all through funding rehab centers and giving people chances to actually have lives again. Give people something to lose. Something to live for. (Psychedelics as treatment would also MASSIVELY help.) If you do that, you'll find very probably that way fewer people will relapse, whether it be alcohol or fentanyl. You can't just have it be all stick. You need some carrot too. But the stick is all authoritarians and extremists seem to understand...
But it won't. At all. It just moves it someplace else entirely out of governmental hands.
It's supposed to be their own business. If they fully consent, then it's entirely their choice. Whether it's a good choice or a bad choice is not for me or you to decide for them.
It's not. At all. Abortion concerns a non-consenting life. Pornography (assuming no coercion of any kind and the participants are all of age) is a consensual construct.
I mean... Back in ancient times, someone's nude body was hardly the worst thing you would see even when you were just 8 years old. That said, I do understand what you're saying, and beyond implementing my system for this, I don't entirely have a solution there beyond the fact that the parents need to parent and there's only so much you can do regardless. As one grows up, the world must, sooner or later, introduce itself. The parents need to make sure that when that does happen, the child is properly prepared for it.
The centerists got shamed or booted out and the extremists took over.
then start regulating the rest of the industry until it's under control.
It won't ever be "under control". Just pushed to different places. And for what? If you want to punish sex-trafficking, do it. You don't need to ban porn to enforce that. Actually, if anything, banning porn makes busting sex-traffickers harder as they retreat underground more.
Pictures and/or videos depicting one or more adults engaging in, and/or performing sexual acts with the sole intent of arousing the viewer.
See Vendor's reply to this.
Women should practice modesty and not be whores
Why is dressing sexy being "a whore"?
I have seen, with my own eyes, literal children going into a drag show and watching naked men dance around dressed as women, while the police stand outside and tell you “we have to remain neutral”
Wait... How have you seen it "with your own eyes"? Did you actually go to these drag shows yourself?
They forced the addicts into jail until the withdrawals were over.
Guess what, man? Withdrawals aren't the only aspect of drug addiction. They didn't solve any problem. They just made things worse for the lower class in order to make themselves feel better. And regardless, are we SERIOUSLY going to promote a nation that decides you need to be killed just because you owned a bunch of fucking weed?
I think a lot of addicts do want to use.
Well yeah. They want to use because their lives are shit. That or they're tricked into taking fentanyl (bad drug sourcing is yet another problem by making drugs illegal by the way) and get hooked.
I don’t know what a coping skill is but hell even I can manage to stay clean.
People's reactions to different drugs are not always the same. Some people, for example, find weed to be addictive, whereas other people can't even stand meth. You need to have more empathy. Now, yeah, let's say you DO give someone all the resources in the world to quit and they still do it. Then yes, there's not much at all you can do in that case and no amount of empathy is going to make them stop. But that's my point. To just completely deprive addicts of resources to help themselves have a new start and THEN blame them for relapsing because "they didn't try hard enough" is both inaccurate and insulting to them I feel.
people abuse it.
People abuse it because there's no other form of relief, or very few forms. You know, there have been other countries that used to struggle with a huge heroin problem, but they fixed it all through funding rehab centers and giving people chances to actually have lives again. Give people something to lose. Something to live for. (Psychedelics as treatment would also MASSIVELY help.) If you do that, you'll find very probably that way fewer people will relapse, whether it be alcohol or fentanyl. You can't just have it be all stick. You need some carrot too. But the stick is all authoritarians and extremists seem to understand...
but it destroys the market for it.
But it won't. At all. It just moves it someplace else entirely out of governmental hands.
Women sell naked pictures of themselves for $5 a month and this is supposed to be celebrated? This is supposed to be a good thing?
It's supposed to be their own business. If they fully consent, then it's entirely their choice. Whether it's a good choice or a bad choice is not for me or you to decide for them.
How many years was this idea pushed into the mainstream until people were okay with it? It’s kind of the same thing with pornography.
It's not. At all. Abortion concerns a non-consenting life. Pornography (assuming no coercion of any kind and the participants are all of age) is a consensual construct.
You’re not supposed to be exposed to hardcore pornography at 8 years old
I mean... Back in ancient times, someone's nude body was hardly the worst thing you would see even when you were just 8 years old. That said, I do understand what you're saying, and beyond implementing my system for this, I don't entirely have a solution there beyond the fact that the parents need to parent and there's only so much you can do regardless. As one grows up, the world must, sooner or later, introduce itself. The parents need to make sure that when that does happen, the child is properly prepared for it.
All the social groups are shit because all the cool kids left.
The centerists got shamed or booted out and the extremists took over.
Last edited: