• User-uploading of files is now fully enabled!! Check out our full announcement for details.

    All accounts with 0 posts on them have been purged. If you are coming back to us after a long time and you find you can't log in, then that would probably be why.

Comparing Crysis & Crysis 2

Arnox

Master
Staff member
Founder
Messages
6,496
A lot of people say Crysis 2 is inferior to the first one, and to that I agree. To a point. Crysis 2 is not as customizable at all, has more constrained levels, has a more unstable framerate, and the aliens were a let down. In terms of the core gameplay though, I think Crysis 2 actually redeems itself a lot. There's also the naturally superb graphics and sound. At first I preferred the first one's gameplay, but now, having played the second one again for a while, I see one isn't better over the other. They're just different.

In the first one, you're leaner and faster. Speed mode was incredibly powerful and could be abused to hell and back, allowing you to get out of all manner of sticky situations and into incredibly advantageous spots. However, even in armor mode, you'll still go down kinda fast with any sort of sustained fire. Due almost purely to this, there's a big emphasis on positioning, dodging, and thinking fast.

In the second one though, things have changed. Speed mode has been heavily neutered, making you run at a normal pace. Armor mode though got juiced up a ton, now pretty much turning you into a walking tank. And even without armor mode, you're still pretty beefy, able to shrug off a lot of shots before you hit the red.

So as you can see, the first one emphasizes offensive play and to think and move fast. The second one emphasizes defensive play and efficiency. The first is a sprint to the finish line. The second is a slow but steady march of death and destruction. By the way, this is not accounting for cloak mode which can be abused equally as much in both games. In fact, I think it's so broken, I don't really use it that much, if at all, even if it is admittedly fun to use sometimes anyway.
 
I played Crysis 2 before 1, and I think I have a lot more fond memories of 1. There were a lot more "emergent" properties of 1 which made it stand out in my mind.


Also, I think more things were destructible in 1. I think I remember causing lots of explosions and blowing up some huts.
 
Houseman said:
Also, I think more things were destructible in 1. I think I remember causing lots of explosions and blowing up some huts.

There was partial destructibility, yeah.
 
Ugh, you reminded me that I am incapable of even playing Crysis 3 on PC because Origin is shit and refuse to launch the game...
 
Samtemdo8 said:
Ugh, you reminded me that I am incapable of even playing Crysis 3 on PC because Origin is shit and refuse to launch the game...

Fuck Origin. And fuck Uplay too.
 
Arnox said:
Samtemdo8 said:
Ugh, you reminded me that I am incapable of even playing Crysis 3 on PC because Origin is shit and refuse to launch the game...

Fuck Origin. And fuck Uplay too.

Uplay works so far, Far Cry 3 and Primal actually launches.

For some reason with Origin I can't launch Mass Effect 2 and Crysis 3. But I can launch Battlefield 1942 and Mass Effect 3.

And i still wish for those fucks at EA to release Mass Effect 3 on Steam already.
 
Samtemdo8 said:
Uplay works so far, Far Cry 3 and Primal actually launches.

For some reason with Origin I can't launch Mass Effect 2 and Crysis 3. But I can launch Battlefield 1942 and Mass Effect 3.

And i still wish for those fucks at EA to release Mass Effect 3 on Steam already.

I'm just tired of these turds releasing crap on their own services and not even bothering to compete with Steam. I wonder if it's even saving them money due to server costs.
 
Arnox said:
Samtemdo8 said:
Uplay works so far, Far Cry 3 and Primal actually launches.

For some reason with Origin I can't launch Mass Effect 2 and Crysis 3. But I can launch Battlefield 1942 and Mass Effect 3.

And i still wish for those fucks at EA to release Mass Effect 3 on Steam already.

I'm just tired of these turds releasing crap on their own services and not even bothering to compete with Steam. I wonder if it's even saving them money due to server costs.

You think that's bad, Movie/TV companies are trying to put their products on thier own streaming service cutting out the Netflix middle man.

They are trying to cabalize internet streaming.
 
Samtemdo8 said:
You think that's bad, Movie/TV companies are trying to put their products on thier own streaming service cutting out the Netflix middle man.

They are trying to cabalize internet streaming.

It won't work. People aren't gonna fork over money for 4+ different streaming services.
 
Back
Top